Skip to content
[email protected] | 800-579-3031
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Media Partners Worldwide
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • Media
    • Media
    • Radio
    • TV OTT
    • Streaming Audio
    • Influencer
    • Hispanic
    • Podcasting
    • SiriusXM
  • About Us
  • News
  • Contact

The Compelling Case for Radio vs. Streaming

Posted on March 16, 2015 by Media Partners Worldwide

Peter W. Burton, VP/GM, Bonneville International, Los Angeles, in December 2014 wrote about radio’s competitive position vis-à-vis online streaming services, stating that the choice of radio over streaming could not be clearer with an insightful depiction of broadcast radio’s enduring strength as the primary audio medium:

I am sending this to those that I know in the buying community to be thoughtful, intelligent and considerate about where your money is placed. As we approach 2015, I realize you might be encouraged to replace a radio station or two for a pure play radio product. For various reasons, I would simply ask you to consider the following information. As an industry, broadcast radio is losing millions of dollars to pure play radio and I would be remiss if I didn’t defend our position. We have studied, watched and tested the pure play model as an ad vehicle extensively. It is our well thought out fact based opinion that pure play radio is not an appropriate replacement for a broadcast radio station, as the two are very different products.

  1. The pure play (mainly Pandora) registration process is a non-social login which doesn’t allow for verification of the actual user. Accuracy is not checked or audited in this area. So, verification of age, gender and location is inaccurate. Any claims of accuracy in this area should be questioned. From an overall audience standpoint, Pandora has gone as far as admitting in their annual report that there is duplication in their monthly user numbers. So, they have no idea how many total different listeners they have. Because of this, a cume number is impossible to come by with any accuracy. This would result in an impossible comparison between radio and the pure play streaming products from a total user standpoint.
  1. Pure plays (specifically Pandora) do not prompt on cell phones which is 80% of their listener base. So, unlike the PPM, they have no idea whether their users are hearing the ads or not. It also makes it impossible to come up with an accurate TSL figure. So, the two figures of cume and TSL used casino online in calculating AQH are derived in a completely different way. This makes the Triton numbers impossible to compare to that of Nielsen radio ratings as the two methodologies are completely different. Any accurate comparison between different mediums must utilize the same methodology to ensure accuracy. Additionally, audience metrics derived by streaming to an IP address is NOT the same as audience metrics that are generated by the Nielsen PPM device. In order for a broadcast radio station to be credited for listening, the device/person must be within actual hearing distance of the radio station signal. This is not the case with current streaming measurement. Pure plays are credited with audience even though the IP address continues to receive the stream while the listener is no longer present in the room.
  1. These two products are not only different but they should be considered different industries and never replaceable by the other. Evaluating and allowing pure play radio to aggregate all of its individual streams in a specific demographic is analogous to evaluating broadcaster’s aggregation of all its stations within a given market. At a minimum, they (specifically Pandora who has paid Triton Media to rate them) should break down its audience into the 25 major formats to get a truly accurate view of its relative strength in relation to broadcast stations. Radio delivers a message simultaneously to hundreds of thousands/millions of people verses the audio pure plays delivering them one-to-one with no capability of generating simultaneous exposure and reach.

In Southern California, 94% of the population is reached by radio. This is a larger figure than Cable, Broadcast TV, and print and certainly pure play radio (by a wide margin). Unlike pure plays, broadcast stations provide format purity enabling advertisers to match their messaging with the mindset of the listeners at the time of exposure. What’s going on inside the listeners mind is the most important environment of all. Please understand that we believe that pure play radio products like Pandora and Spotify are good consumer products, but not suitable advertising vehicles. They are especially not suitable when considering the replacement of a radio station as they simply deliver something at a totally different level in a different way. They (specifically Pandora) have had to morph themselves into an ad vehicle in order to survive financially, so accurate measurement of listenership was a necessary afterthought.

Peter concluded by saying he appreciates your consideration on all these points and welcomes a conversation on 323-692-5401 if you have thoughts, concerns or questions.

]]>

Posted in RadioTagged Pandora, radio, streaming

Post navigation

Piolín: Hispanic Podcasting Breakthrough Talent?
Trends for In-Car Listening

Recent Posts

  • Utilizing Radio Advertising for Dental Practices
  • Choosing The Right Marketing Channel
  • The Power of Short-Form Video
  • The Benefits of Social Media Ads
  • The Future Of Audio Advertising – From The Agency Perspective.

Archives

  • January 2023
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • October 2019
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014

Related Articles

Utilizing Radio Advertising for Dental Practices

Being that there are many ways to advertise one’s dental practices and services, you might feel overwhelmed and burnt out, either because you can’t seem to choose the option that benefits you or you just don’t know where to start. While social media and podcasts have changed the entire landscape

Read More

READ MORE

The Future Of Audio Advertising – From The Agency Perspective.

Our fabulous Founder and CEO, Natalie Hale was recently featured on Inside Audio Marketing. What lies ahead for audio advertising in a media world that is ever changing? Inside Radio spoke with two ad agency execs, from very different backgrounds, to get a sense of what’s next in the realm

Read More

READ MORE

3 Best Advertising Channels to Reach Millennials

3 Best Advertising Channels to Reach Millennials People who walked into adulthood in the 21st century and whose ages range between 18 and 36 make up this impressive millennial group. This group identifies with the latest technology and internet trends, owning and using modern gadgets such as the PC and

Read More

READ MORE

Get In Touch

133 The Promenade North Unit 106
Long Beach, California 90802
800-579-3031
[email protected]

About Us

Media Partners Worldwide offers media planning, buying and creative for Radio/Audio, TV, Outdoor/Print and Digital. Our buying team can save you 30 to 70 percent off your media costs!

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Useful Links

  • About
  • Media
  • News
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy

Latest News

  • Utilizing Radio Advertising for Dental Practices
  • Choosing The Right Marketing Channel
  • The Power of Short-Form Video
  • The Benefits of Social Media Ads
  • The Future Of Audio Advertising – From The Agency Perspective.
Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved. Media Partners Worldwide.